Posts from the ‘Science and art’ Category

May 16

Deconstructing DNA

Could Watson and Crick really have been wrong about the structure of DNA? Ayala Ochert meets the artist who has created an astonishing alternative. Published in New Scientist

Read more

• Articles

  • June 2015
  • June 2011
  • October 2009
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • April 2003
  • December 2002
  • June 2002
  • April 2002
  • February 2002
  • December 2001
  • November 2001
  • September 2001
  • April 2001
  • September 2000
  • March 2000
  • December 1999
  • May 1998

• Categories

  • Publications
    • BioNews
    • California Monthly
    • Discover magazine
    • New Beginnings
    • New Scientist
    • The Independent
    • Times Higher Education Supplement
  • Subject
    • Anthropology
    • Biology
      • DNA
      • Genomes
    • Breastfeeding
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Mathematics
    • Physics
      • Astronomy
    • Science and art
    • Science and law
    • Science education

• Tags

  amphibian decline animal rights archaeology art Asperger's Syndrome atrazine Barbara McClintock Berkeley biological nurturing birds brain imaging cancer chimps climate change Clovis coffee dinosaurs DNA double helix Earth-like planets economics endocrine disruptors energy efficiency evolution exoplanets fair trade fertility forestry gene editing gene regulation genetic engineering genomics Geoff Marcy George Akerlof history hormones Human Genome Project human migration Ignacio Chapela Janet Yellen junk DNA laid-back breastfeeding maize Mark Curtis mathematical beauty mathematical proof Maurice Wilkins methylation MRI nanotechnology neuroscience Nobel Prize Novartis palaeontology renewables retrotransposons RNA smart dust Solutrean Steven Wise Syngenta transposons Tyrone Hayes Watson and Crick wildfires Z-DNA